Every Client Matters
We talk often about using a portfolio approach to managing MSP clients — and when you take this approach, every client matters. While there is such a thing as good churn, most of the time keeping the clients you have is extremely important.
According to research cited by the Harvard Business Review, acquiring a new client is 5 to 25 times more expensive than optimizing an existing one — a principle that holds true across industries and is especially pronounced in managed services, where onboarding complexity adds additional cost.
MSPCFO is trusted by hundreds of MSPs to deliver insights to optimize their client base; however, we were curious about what drives churn in an MSP. So we took a deep-dive into the data, and what we found stopped us in our tracks.
Not because churn is a new topic, but because the specific patterns in the data challenge some of the assumptions MSPs often make about which clients to prioritize, which relationships to invest in, and what “good” account management actually looks like. This post shares what our data found — and why every MSP serious about EBITDA growth should be paying attention.
What We Found in the Data
First, a disclaimer: what we found is what the data reveals, and while it does a good job finding correlations – it is not always causation. We don’t always have the story about why one thing causes another, but we can make some guesses.
Let’s define what “churn” means. We looked at end-user clients with recurring revenue in one month who had no recurring revenue the next month. Then we looked for patterns. Here is what the data showed, and what we think it means.
Finding 1: High-Efficiency Clients Churn 30% More
In our data, higher-efficiency clients were churning at a 30% higher rate than lower-efficiency clients.
Efficiency, in this context, refers to how well an MSP services a client relative to what they charge. A high-efficiency client is one where the MSP delivers fewer hours and makes more money — the relationship is profitable and lean. A low-efficiency client is the opposite: more hours delivered, less revenue per hour. By that measure, high-efficiency clients are the ones an MSP would most want to keep. And yet, in the aggregate data, these are the clients walking out the door at a higher rate.
The story the data suggests: you did such a great job standardizing them that they don’t need you as often. These clients may be getting an invoice every month for white-glove services, but not seeing or hearing from your team as often. This may make them easier targets for a competitor promising more hands-on service. MSPs that consistently lose their highest-margin clients can be left with clients who over-utilize the service desk — and margins reflect that over time.
Finding 2: Low-Revenue Clients Churn 30% More
Clients on the low end of the revenue distribution are also churning at significantly higher rates — 30% more than median clients in our data.
This one may not always be a bad thing. If the center of gravity for an MSP’s agreements is $2,500/month and there are a handful of $500/month clients in the mix, those exits may actually free up account management bandwidth for higher-value relationships. The key is intention: is the client mix being managed consciously, or are clients leaving without a clear understanding of why?
This finding is a prompt to evaluate an MSP’s Ideal Client Profile (ICP) and ask whether the smallest clients are receiving the right level of attention — and whether the economics justify it.
Finding 3: Clients Without Projects Churn 60% More
This is the most dramatic finding in our data. Clients who completed few or no projects in the past year were churning at a 60% higher rate compared to clients who engaged in four or more projects.
Projects are not just revenue — they are a signal of engagement. A client who is investing in projects is a client who sees a future with the MSP. They’re not just consuming break-fix support; they’re building something alongside the team.
This does not mean projects should be forced on clients who don’t need them. But a client who hasn’t engaged in any meaningful project work over the past year is a churn risk. That absence may signal a need for a different kind of account management conversation, a renewed technology roadmap, or simply a more intentional relationship check-in.
Finding 4: Ticket Budgets Correlate with 50%+ Less Churn
When we dug into ticket budget data, we found something striking. MSPs that used ticket budgets — regardless of whether clients went over or under budget — experienced more than 50% less churn than MSPs without them.
What are ticket budgets? These are hours or minutes budgets you set to do regular tasks or by type, subtype, and item. Essentially how long you believe these tickets should take your team to resolve.
At first, we thought the key was being over or under budget. But when we stepped back, we realized the common denominator was simply the presence of budgets at all.
One interpretation: MSPs that use ticket budgets tend to be operationally mature organizations. They have structure, discipline, and visibility into their service delivery. Churn is lower not because of the budget itself, but because of everything else those MSPs are doing well. It’s a proxy for operational excellence — and operational excellence retains clients.
What do you think?
Why This Churn Data Matters
Most MSPs have an EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) target, and there are three levers for improving EBITDA:
- Add new revenue
- Optimize existing revenue
- Reduce SG&A costs
Adding revenue is a MUST in an MSP, but relying only on that could leave you frustrated. Sales is arguably one of the most challenging roles in an MSP – and it can be expensive. In fact, client acquisition is often cited as one of the top challenges by MSP Executives.
High churn turns a new logo pipeline into a treadmill. According to ScalePad’s 2025 MSP Business Trends Report, 36% of MSPs have retention rates below 50% — meaning they must replace half their client base annually just to stay flat. All that acquisition investment simply offsets losses rather than driving growth.
The churn findings above offer a different way to think about the problem. They suggest that EBITDA growth is not only a sales challenge — it is equally an account management challenge. Retaining high-efficiency clients, keeping clients engaged in project work, and building operational maturity are all levers that protect recurring revenue — and EBITDA.
What Good Account Management Looks Like Through This Lens
The data points to a few practical areas where Account Managers and vCIOs can make a direct impact on churn — and therefore on EBITDA:
- Pay attention to high-efficiency clients. In the aggregate data, these are the clients churning at elevated rates — possibly because they feel underserved relative to what they pay. QBRs, proactive reporting, and value communication help ensure those clients understand what they’re getting.
- Keep clients engaged in their technology roadmap. Clients without active project work are churning at 60% higher rates in our data. Regular business reviews that include forward-looking technology planning keep clients invested in the relationship.
- Be intentional about low-revenue clients. Some of those exits may be healthy. The question is whether it’s a deliberate portfolio decision or simply attrition that goes unexamined.
- Invest in operational maturity. Ticket budgets appear to be a proxy for something bigger: the kind of structure and discipline that characterizes well-run MSPs. Building those habits is what moves the needle on churn over the long term.
The Bottom Line
Churn is not just a retention metric. It is an EBITDA metric. Every client that walks out the door represents recurring revenue that has to be replaced before an MSP can grow. Our aggregate data shows that the clients most at risk are often not the ones MSPs would expect: high-efficiency accounts, clients without active project work, and organizations served by MSPs that haven’t yet built the operational discipline that ticket budgets signal.
These are correlations, not guarantees — the patterns we found in the data won’t apply identically to every MSP. But they are a starting point for asking better questions about which client relationships deserve more attention and why.
We built MSPCFO to help MSPs see exactly where these dynamics live inside their own client base, so account management teams can be proactive rather than reactive. If you’d like to see what the data shows for your business, we’d love to help.
About MSPCFO
Winner of both the Partner Innovation and Partner Advocate awards at IT Nation Evolve 2022, MSPCFO is a business intelligence platform designed to solve the unique profitability and productivity challenges managed services providers face. Since the application’s introduction in 2014, MSPCFO has helped thousands of MSPs and TSPs in the United States, Canada, APAC, and Europe identify improvement targets that directly boost their bottom line. Founder and CEO Larry Cobrin’s consulting, investment banking, private equity and product management experience coalesced in his development of the MSPCFO software and business model.
Follow MSPCFO
Want to Improve Your Bottom Line?
Schedule Your Personalized Demo